Standardizing State Standardized Assessments

Work Cited:
“Educational Assessment.” Narr. Larry Jacobs. Education Talk Radio. Blogtalkradio. EduTalk, Swampscott, 26 Oct. 2010. Educational Assessment with Larry Jacobs. Web. 21 Feb. 2011.

In this online radio broadcase, the host, Larry Jacobs, interviews Scott Elliott about current assessment trends. Elliott, president of SEG Measurement, an Education Assessment and Research Firm, works with thirty states in an attempt to standardize Educational standards for secondary and elementary education.

Elliott believes that reaching common state education standards is important, as many families are forced to move in this economy to find work. When students change states, they may be underprepared or overprepared in their new state if standards are not equivalent. He believes that we, as a country, must unite in order to compete against other talented countries, especially in a time where the rate of knowledge is changing at a rapid pace. Standards must constantly change to reflect this accelerating pace of new knowledge.

Elliott’s company, SEG of New Hope, PA, is working to change textbooks to reflect changing standards, and Elliott also notes that online test delivery is becoming more prominent. He concludes by asserting that we need teachers of all levels to get on the same page as far as assessment is concerned so that we can assess students based on their abilities instead of varying state standards. He urges listeners to agree that states must agree on common standards if we want to help our students succeed academically.

What are my thoughts? It sounds good in theory, but I worry that some states’ standards will become lower in an attempt to standardize them with other states. Actual standardization seems quite impossible. Think of school districts in the same states and how different their expectations are. For example, even within the same state, one student in school X may receive a 3.5 GPA, and a student from school Y may receive a 3.5 GPA but not know as much as the first student. I think that standardization seems like a logical concept, but when implemented, I worry that it could stifle students (kind of like an ill-constructed rubric). I think this is why college entrance requirements often look at more than one criteria (standardized tests, essays, GPA, extracurricular activities, etc.).

The Plus/Minus System: A Positive or Negative Idea?

Work Cited:
Cohen, Jordan. “Plus/Minus Grading Motivates Students.” TCU Daily Skiff 1 Feb. 2006: n. pag. Web. 13 Feb. 2011.

The newspaper article “Plus/Minus Grading Motivates Students” discusses the trend of colleges and universities switching to the plus/minus grading system, and the possibility for TCU, or Texas Christian University, to adopt the grading system. While some think that the system will solely benefit the “academically poor” students, Cohen asserts that it will serve as an incentive for students to learn more and stay focused on their classes.

One student, Mandy Velasquez, says that it will motivate her. She explains that she would aim for a B+ if she were in the B range. She also predicts that the school is implementing the system in an attempt to combat grade inflation. Some believe that schools like TCU are considering the switch in grading system in order to “remain competitive” with the current grading systems among colleges, other students want to modify the grading system further by implementing a one-hundred point system.

What do I think? I think that the minus/plus system is fair if is also allows for the possibility of receiving an A+. Some systems do not allow for the student to get an A+, and it seems that, without offering benefits, the system is only punishing the student. In my undergraduate institution, I received a few A+ along with A-, and they evened each other out for the most part. I actually would be an advocate for a 100-point system because it would provide more accuracy in grading and provide motivation for those students who aim for a certain grade and see no reason to work harder for no reward (for instance, some students aim for an 82 rather than an 89 because, in schools without a plus/minus system, both are a B). Thus, plus/minus systems provide more motivation and accuracy, and the 100=point system provides a new level of accuracy.

While this online news article was published in 2006, I chose to include it because it is the first of many subsequent articles from college and university representatives who consider changing the grading system to a plus/minus system. I wonder if a 100-point system is next?

Standards Replace Letter Grades: Promoting Clarity or Confusion?

Work Cited:

Stegmeir, Mary. "A New Way to Grade: Standards Replace Letters in Waukee." Des Moines Register: E-Edition. Des Moines Register, 7 Feb. 2011. Web. 7 Feb. 2011. <http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20110207/NEWS02/102070310/A-new-way-to-grade-Standards-replace-letters-in-Waukee>.

Image Taken From: http://tristanverboven.wordpress.com/

The news article "A New Way to Grade: Standards Replace Letters in Waukee" describes a trend that is emerging for secondary schools to assess students with standards instead of letters.  For example, teachers at Waukee Middle School (Iowa) give "scores" of beginning, developing, secure, or exceeds to their students instead of A, B, C, D, or F.  Why did this article catch my eye?  Because it could affect colleges someday.  First of all, how will college admissions view these categories?  The school board president of the district acknowledges that grades play an important role in college admissions and scholarship programs (Stegmeir).  I wonder, if this trend catches on, will colleges eventually embrace this trend?  I see it as a far-fetched idea, but a possibility.

Why are more and more schools turning to standards-based grades?  They are hoping to improve student performance, according to Doug Reeves, founder of the Leadership and Learning Center in Colorado (Stegmeir).  According to Stegmeir's article, many parents worry that this will leave students unprepared for high school and even take away a motivator for succeeding (as letter grades tend to create an atmosphere of competition).

What do I think?  I think, what's the difference?  Doesn't "A" mean "exceeds" anyway?  And isn't "developing" a nice way of saying, "You got a D."?  Good teachers will indicate to students how they can do better, and I find the categories an attempt for schools to get parents and teachers thinking about what letter grades mean.  The same goal can be reached if there were a key on top of the report card explaining what each grade means.  This way, students can still be considered for scholarships at the college and university level.  If some colleges adopt the standards system in place of a letter system, then it would pose a problem for students who apply  to graduate programs at schools that use the letter grade system.

Therefore, while I see that the intentions are good--standards would spell out more clearly where a student is lacking--it needs to be supplemented with a letter grade or at least points from the GPA scale so that transferring to other schools and applying for scholarships or admission to colleges and universities would be feasible.  I do believe, however, that there is a problem with the subjective nature of grading (whether students are assigned with a letter, phrase, or symbol!) because some teachers grade differently than others.  This is why, when I am an instructor, I will lay out my expectations clearly so that there is no confusion as to how a student can earn an A, B, C, D, F.  I want students to know what each grade means to me (since it seems to mean different things to different teachers).  This is where grading rubrics come in (or at least grading guidelines).  They can help students to see where they fall short when the grade fails to convey this information to them.

Link to Online Article

Do Instructors' Assessment Methods Allow For Mistakes and Growth?

MLA Article Citation:
Reedy, Randy. "Formative and Summative Assessment: A Possible Alternative to the Grading-Reporting Dilemma." NAASP Bulletin 79.47 (1995): 47-51. Education: A SAGE Full-Text Collection. Web.

Above Image From: http://english-trainer.blogspot.com/2011/01/english-essay-writing-tips.html

In "Formative and Summative Assessment: A Possible Alternative to the Grading-Reporting Dilemma," Reedy begins by describing different types of grading methods.  I found this very helpful, as it encouraged me to ponder what type of grading I will use in the classroom.  The types she describes are:

• Product Learning--measured by a summative evaluation of student achievement (teacher assesses student after instructional sequence has been completed)
• Process Learning--emphasizes the student's work as he or she completes tasks on the way to the end product
• Progress Learning--compares what the student knows now compared to what he or she knew before learning began (48-49)

While the article explored the option of not using letters or percentages to grade and instead just giving feedback, I find that option quite unrealistic at the college level.  I think students would riot and possibly throw things at me if I were to say, "Nice job on your essays, everyone!  I gave you feedback, but there will be no grade assigned."  HA!  That would not work.  However, I do see the benefit of considering the students' process in addition to their product learning.  In another class, Theory of Composition and Rhetoric, we have begun to explore the idea of students creating portfolios in which pieces would be graded along the way in addition to given feedback, and the students would have the opportunity to revise for their final portfolio.  This product would comprise a large portion of the grade, because it would demonstrate the students' best work, after they have taken feedback from the instructor into consideration.

Reedy articulates this well when she says, "Evaluation during the summative phase can evaluate student learning and also provide information on how well the teacher's formative evaluation served the student. It is at the summative point that letter grades have a legitimate role to play" (50).  Summative assessment is important (this is why for all of my classes I have a 20 page research paper, presentation, final exam or portfolio due at the end of the semester).  However, by having formative evaluation along the way, the teacher has a chance to provide feedback.  Part of the feedback is the letter grade ("Oh, man, I got an F.  I need to work harder or ask the professor for help" or "Yes!  I got an A.  I am on the right track and I will stick to my study habits.  They are paying off.")  Furthermore, any comments a teacher gives can help a student in the future.  If I teach a composition next year, I will definitely schedule at least one face-to-face meeting with each student (even if it is only 15 minutes) to give them feedback on their writing.  This way, they will be forced to acknowledge my advice, even if they ignore my written feedback.  This is an example of formative assessment, or an evaluation of process learning.

Furthermore, this article made me think of how to weigh my assignments.  I believe that there should be "low-stake" assignments at first, as Dr. Wardle would say, so that students can have a chance to see my feedback and incorporate it into their next assignment.  Then I would make the subsequent assignments worth more (or let the students drop their lowest grade; this would achieve a similar opportunity for the student to get a chance to try without too much pressure).  As Reedy says it, "By developing a grading policy that provides non-threatening feedback, during formative evaluation and remediation, the student can concentrate on learning" (50).  Again, I realize that "non-threatening" does not need to mean "not graded," as I would grade all of my students' assignments (I believe that since they have taken the time to do the assignment, I should take the time to grade it and provide feedback).  However, I would make the initial assignments non-threatening by either making earlier assignment less points like Dr. Wardle does, or dropping each student's lowest grade, as Dr. Trouard does for our Three Position Papers.

While this article is a bit older and does not provide earth-shattering news, it does deal with a concern that continues to be debated by teachers and educational institutions everywhere: assessment.  Furthermore, it gave me a lot to think about regarding how to grade and how to set up my assignments on my syllabus.  I would like to think that I could promote learning by allowing students to make attempts at skills in which they may or may not have confidence, giving feedback, and giving them opportunities to try again with that feedback in mind.  It is what one may call "learning."  :)

You will need to be on UCF campus or have your library ID number ready to access this article:

Click this link to full text article through SAGE Full-Text